Your teamWeekly review: filtered straight to the conversations customers rated badly. One subject kept repeating — delivery.
CustomerIf I order today, when would it actually turn up?
AdoomiStandard delivery takes about a week from dispatch, and you'll get an email when your order leaves us. If you need it sooner than that, I can pass your details to the team and someone will confirm what's possible.
Your teamRated unhelpful. Reading it back, the wording was not the problem — the assistant answered exactly what our delivery page says, and that page has not been touched since we changed courier. It was quoting us.
Your teamDelivery page rewritten to match how we actually ship now. The sync picked the change up on its own; nobody retaught the assistant anything.
Your teamThe following week, same question from a different visitor:
CustomerHow quickly do you deliver?
AdoomiMainland orders placed before the daily cut-off go out on a next-day courier, and the times for other destinations are on our delivery page. You'll get a tracking email when it's dispatched, and I can pass your postcode to the team if you'd like a firm date.
Your teamThe following week, no new poor ratings had arrived on delivery questions.
The rating never said what was wrong — it said where to look. Nothing announced it either: the run of poor ratings was found because somebody sat down to filter for them. Reading the conversation is what showed the answer was faithful to a page that had gone stale, and the fix landed on that page rather than on the assistant. Ratings recovering on that subject is how this illustration ends, not an outcome Adoomi promises.