Answers the list you already publish
Therapies offered, session fees and any concessionary places, insurer cover, online or in the room, where the waiting list stands — straight from pages you approved.
Most first contact with a therapy practice is admin wrapped around a hard decision: which therapies you offer, what a session costs, whether the list is open, whether you take an insurer. Adoomi answers that from the pages you approved, at the hour it is asked and in the enquirer's language. It does not counsel, assess anyone or decide what would suit them. Where a message sounds like crisis it surfaces the guidance your own page publishes and routes the conversation to the person you named.
Fig. 01.A · Psychologists / therapy clinics
Fig. 02.A · pain quotesSomeone deciding whether to start therapy reads your therapies page, your fees page and your team page in one sitting, usually after everyone has gone home. What they cannot find, they ask — and a therapy enquiry is not a plumbing enquiry. It took something to send, and silence until Tuesday reads as an answer. The practice cannot safely reply from a phone between clients either, because the wrong sentence in that thread costs more than a slow one.
Therapies offered, session fees and any concessionary places, insurer cover, online or in the room, where the waiting list stands — straight from pages you approved.
What kind of work someone wants, in what format, which days work and a way to get back to them. That is the whole ask: no symptoms, no history, nothing rated.
Fit, suitability and distress end the assistant's turn: your published crisis wording is surfaced and the enquiry reaches the person you named, in the enquirer's own words.
The pre-enquiry list — therapies, fees, concessionary places, insurers, format and how long the wait is — answered from your own pages, with fit, history and anything clinical left to your clinicians.
An enquiry is only useful to intake when it says what kind of work someone is after, in what format, which days would work and how to reach them. Adoomi asks exactly those, in your own wording, and stops: nobody is asked to type out their history or how bad things have got in order to get an appointment. Any therapy named back to them is one your pages already list, never a suggestion. What reaches your coordinator is a first call that can actually be made.
With Adoomi
Fig. 06.A · after-hoursAdoomi keeps answering the published list after the practice closes: therapies offered, what sessions cost, online or in the room, where the waiting list stands, how someone starts. It does not pretend anyone is awake. An enquiry captured at midnight is an enquiry, not a reply — the alert reaches whoever you set, and a person answers in the morning. What it will not do at that hour is discuss how someone is feeling: that gets your published crisis wording and a route to your named contact.
Every therapy practice answers one list on repeat — therapies offered, fees and any concessionary places, insurers, online or in person, how long the wait is, how to start — and all of it is already published. Adoomi answers from there, so nobody between sessions is retyping it. What still reaches a human is what needed one: fit, an awkward arrangement, an enquirer who is struggling. Each arrives in their own words, by email alert or WhatsApp handoff to whoever you set.
Fig. 08.A · controlsThe line sits well before anything clinical. Adoomi answers what your pages publish — therapies, fees, insurers, availability — and declines the rest: no advice, no view on risk, no opinion on what suits anyone. A crisis message is never engaged with: it repeats your own published wording — your out-of-hours route, 111 or 999 — and goes to your named contact. Chats are held in the EU, exportable and erasable under GDPR, with logs carrying no content. That is data handling, not compliance.
Therapies, fees, insurer cover and waiting-list status come from content you approved. Anything outside it is declined, not improvised.
The assistant does not counsel, weigh risk or ask anyone to explain more. It repeats the crisis wording you publish and hands the conversation to your named contact.
Which therapy suits someone, whether a therapist is the right match, anything about their history — each one is a handover. The assistant captures the enquiry and stops.
Chats sit on EU servers, come back out or get wiped on request, and their content never reaches logs — only IDs do. Compliance stays your practice's job.
The assistant answers both from your own pages — the therapies you list, what an assessment session covers, online or in the room. It repeats your wording rather than describing therapy in general, and it never suggests which one an enquirer should have.
Crisis messages are never worked with in chat. The assistant stops, repeats the crisis guidance your own page publishes, and routes the conversation to the person you named rather than the general enquiry inbox. It does not assess risk, because assessing risk is clinical work.
Matching is a clinician's judgement and stays there. The assistant repeats the specialisms your team pages publish, captures what the enquirer is looking for, and hands the fit question over. It will not confirm a therapist has space unless your pages say so.
Client messages are treated as sensitive from the first line. Conversations stay on EU servers, and a client can ask for theirs to be handed over or wiped under GDPR. The words themselves never reach a log — an enquiry is recorded by identifier only. No tracking cookies are set.
Waiting-list status is answered exactly as your page states it and no further. The assistant holds no diary and cannot book, hold or move a session — it captures the request and passes it to intake, who arrange it the way they always have.
Pricing starts at £0 a month, which covers 50 message credits while a practice tries it out. Above that, £8 buys 200 credits, £20 buys 500, £75 buys 4,000. Set-up is ~10 min of work — connect the pages, read what it drafts, add one line — and nothing is live until the practice signs it off.
The risk for a therapy practice is not an assistant that is unhelpful — it is one that is helpful in the wrong place: reassuring someone, ranking therapies, judging how bad things sound. Adoomi holds no view. It answers from your approved pages, in the enquirer's language, whenever asked, and treats fit, distress and history as handovers rather than as questions to have a go at. Those are limits in how it was built, not promises: silent page, no answer; no fee guessed; nobody's state judged.
Therapy questions get asked late. The published answer — therapies, fees, format, list status — goes out then, in the enquirer's language, rather than on Monday.
Fees, concessionary places and insurer cover are repeated as your pages word them. Where the pages are silent, the assistant says so and captures the question.
A message that sounds like crisis stops the assistant, surfaces your own published wording and reaches the individual you named instead of the shared inbox.
The therapies, fees and getting-started pages are kept accurate already — that is the whole of what it may draw on. Say who picks up an ordinary enquiry and who is named for anything that sounds like crisis, then send it the message you would dread finding on a Monday and read what it says back. Setting it up is ~10 min of work, £0 and 50 message credits are enough to judge it by, and no client sees a word until you have agreed to every one.
Fig. 12.A · Psychologists / therapy clinics